Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Dean Manes v. United States et al
as 2:2023cv10025
Plaintiff:
Dean Manes
Defendant:
United States, Dr. Awad, Elizabeth Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Leveron v. W. Z. Jenkins et al
as 2:2023cv04914
Plaintiff:
Roberto Leveron
Defendant:
W. Z. Jenkins, Sieja, Kaleta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Burgess et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
Lawrence Burgess, Dr. Scott Prince and Kimberly Lux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zachary Pond v. Terrance Doe, et al
as 22-35385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY IRWIN POND
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRANCE DOE, Mental Health Officer, ENTENMAN, "Jane", Officer, JOHN FUNDINGSLAND, Sergeant and others
(PC) Rood v. Secretary et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Colton James Rood
Defendant:
Secretary, E. Carrillo, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rood v. Secretary et al
as 1:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Colton James Rood
Defendant:
Secretary, E. Carrillo, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Kertes et al
as 1:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
H. Kertes, John Wetzel, Kevin Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Warden Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00652
Plaintiff:
Mary Velasco
Defendant:
FNU Cole-Rowls, FNU Lux, FMC Carswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pond v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv05339
Defendant:
Jill Bottemiller, Terrance Doe, Cowlitz County Corrections Department and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Irwin Pond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balderas v. Carr et al
as 4:2021cv00496
Defendant:
Dr. Langham, Lt. Butler, FNU Cole-Rowls and others
Plaintiff:
Dominga Balderas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
