Cases 1 - 10 of 10,008
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
DARYL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANNER v. ROWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
MONTREALL BANNER
Defendant:
C/O ROWDY, C/O GOMEZ, MAC MILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHURST v. TEXT BEHIND et al
as 1:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
LARRY TERRELL WHITEHURST
Defendant:
TEXT BEHIND and VIAPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTLIDGE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MARSELL CARTLIDGE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WRIGHT v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT
Defendant:
GENO RANSOM, FNU POTRELLA, FNU L. BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
