Cases 1 - 10 of 10,603
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Respondent:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Hara v. Bayliss
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Emmanuel O'Hara
Respondent:
Melissa Bayliss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Goods v. Daley et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Deputy Turner, Deputy Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nofflett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Joseph Nofflett
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent:
M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodges v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Hodges
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chafin v. Caudill et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chafin
Defendant:
Steve Caudill, Superintendent Jason Hutson, Joseph Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosser-Burch v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Teyon Rosser-Burch
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Kenneth White
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
