Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ONE OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FUND - MEDICAL MART HOTEL, LTD et al
as 1:2018cv01697
Defendant: WANG WEI, A/K/A JACK WANG, ONE OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN THE CLEVELAND INTERNATIONAL FUND - MEDICAL MART HOTEL, LTD, $141,086.00 WIRED TO REEKAY TECHNOLOGY and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. $95, 246.23 et al
as 5:2018cv00469
Defendant: Solvay Bank Corp Stock Numbers 24113, 24117, 24108, 24105, 24101 and 24096 CUSIP 83441Q105 and dividends, Real property known as 5396 South Bay Road, Town of Salina, County of Onondaga, New York, Real property known as 101 Brassie Drive Town of Van Buren, County of Onondaga, New York and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. $525,695.24, et al
as 16-3542
Defendant: $4,999.99, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha, $50,086.84, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha, $1,000.33, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha and others
Defendant / Appellant: HYS HEALTH MART, INC. and OSAMA H. SALOUHA
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. $525,695.24, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3542
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: $525,695.24, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Investment Acct #74068415, in the name of Osamah H. Salouha, $189,489.08, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #936048107 in the name of other Samah H. Salouha, $1,000.33, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha and others
Defendant: $182,078.99, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct#973832124 in the name of Sbeih Sbeih
United States of America v. 346 Wal-Mart, Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Darden, Footlocker, Macys, Sears, Shell, and Target Gift Cards
as 1:2015cv00597
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 346 Wal-Mart, Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Darden, Footlocker, Macys, Sears, Shell, and Target Gift Cards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tony's Pantry Mart, Inc. #1 v. United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02967
Plaintiff: Tony's Pantry Mart, Inc. #1
Defendant: United States of America, Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Various Amounts Of U.S. Currency Totaling $5,410.00
as 5:2014cv00829
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Various Amounts Of U.S. Currency Totaling $5,410.00 Seized from the Following Locations within Uncle Bills Mini Mart, Raleigh, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $4,455.27
as 5:2014cv00797
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $4,455.27 Seized from the Following Locations within Stantonsburg Friendly Mart, Stantonsburg, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $851.51
as 5:2014cv00757
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $851.51 Seized From the Following Locations within Pikeville Quick Mart, North Carolina: (1) $485.00 in the Cash Register(s), (2) $126.51 Insid
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
United States of America v. Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $5,873.77
as 5:2014cv00670
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Various Amounts of U.S. Currency Totaling $5,873.77 Seized From The Following Locations Within Genoa Mart, Dudley, North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?