Cases 11 - 20 of 69
ALCARAZ et al v. SCHMIDT LANDSCAPING, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00691
Defendant:
GARY E. SCHMIDT, PAUL HAUBER, EVERGREEN NURSERY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS HERNANDEZ SILVA, JOSE SANTANA ALCARAZ and JOSE AREVALO MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ADAMS v. QVC, INC.
as 2:2021cv00646
Defendant:
QVC, INC.
Plaintiff:
LANITRA ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ADAMS v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00222
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ADAMS v. CONSOL ENERGY INC.
as 2:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ADAMS
Defendant:
CONSOL ENERGY INC. and CONSOL ENERGY, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
WHEELER v. APEX ENERGY SERVICE, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01916
Defendant:
ADAM BARBOUR and APEX ENERGY SERVICE, LLC
Plaintiff:
RANDY WHEELER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GOFTON et al v. KFORCE, INC.
as 2:2020cv04886
Plaintiff:
ADAM KIMBREL and HOPE GOFTON
Defendant:
KFORCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams v. Quality Inn & Suites et al
as 1:2020cv01349
Plaintiff:
Charles Adams
Defendant:
Devchand Hospitality, Inc. and Quality Inn & Suites
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CRAWFORD et al v. CDI CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03317
Defendant:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CDI CORPORATION, JOHN DOES, CDI CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM R CRAWFORD and LUCIA DEPRETTO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WASHINGTON et al v. AMPD GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00830
Defendant:
AMPD GROUP, LLC, MICHAEL DESIMONE, AMPD MYRTLE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KIERA WASHINGTON and CHELCIE WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHRISTOPHERSON v. POLYCONCEPT NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00545
Defendant:
Adam Buchbinder, POLYCONCEPT NORTH AMERICA, INC., Brenda Scholl and others
Plaintiff:
rosalyn christopherson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
