Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Shetty v. Cisco Systems
as 3:2016cv06012
Plaintiff:
Shruti Shetty
Defendant:
Cisco Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Woodruff v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv03567
Plaintiff:
Diane Woodruff
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and Elite Office Staff, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lifshitz v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00930
Plaintiff:
Ehud Lifshitz
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rossi v. Cisco Sytems Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv04519
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Rossi
Defendant:
Cisco Sytems Inc. , Cisco Systems Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan, Cisco Systems Inc. Employee Welfare Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kip Sides v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03893
Plaintiff:
Kip Sides
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc. and United Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Banger v. Cisco General Construction Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01037
Plaintiff:
Pawan Banger
Defendant:
Cisco General Construction Inc., East Coast USA Construction Inc, Balwinder Kaur and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Raack v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 5:2014cv04090
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Raack
Defendant:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jason Abner et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05655
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bojorquez, Edan Sheklow, Alfred Pasos and others
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive and City of Los Angeles
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2014cv03006
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Cisco Systems, Inc. Plan
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sweeney et al v. Macek
as 1:2014cv04658
Plaintiff:
James M. Sweeney , John E. Kenny, Jr. , Steven M Cisco and others
Defendant:
Richard L Macek
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
