Cases 21 - 28 of 28
NEWBERRY v. GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INC
as 5:2011cv00286
Plaintiff:
LARRY NEWBERRY
Defendant:
GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Graphic Packaging Int'l. v. Graphic Communications Conf.
as 10-3397
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellant:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, DISTRICT COUNCIL 1, LOCAL 77-P
Graphic Packaging Internationa v. Graphic Communications Confe
as 10-3354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, DISTRICT COUNCIL 1, LOCAL 77-P
Murphy v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co et al
as 3:2010cv01529
Plaintiff:
Samuel Eddie Murphy
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, Graphic Packaging International Inc and Employee Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Gerig v. Graphic Packaging International Inc
as 1:2010cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gerig
Defendant:
Graphic Packaging International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Jones v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
as 4:2009cv02647
Plaintiff:
Alan D. Jones
Defendant:
Graphic Packaging International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Graphic Packaging International Inc v. Graphic Communications Conference International Brotherhood of Teamsters District Council 1 Local 77-P
as 1:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
Graphic Packaging International Inc
Defendant:
Graphic Communications Conference International Brotherhood of Teamsters District Council 1 Local 77-P
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Baugh v. Graphic Packaging International Inc et al
as 3:2008cv01357
Plaintiff:
Deborah Baugh
Defendant:
Graphic Packaging International Inc and Riverwood International Hourly Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
