Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Arszulowicz v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 6:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
Mary Arszulowicz and Mary Arszulowicz
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation and Raytheon Technical Services Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Boumis v. Hartford Insurance Company et al
as 4:2008cv00681
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Boumis
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company, Computer Sciences Corporation Disability Plan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carol Herceg v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 2:2008cv08117
Plaintiff:
Carol Herceg
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and Computer Science Corporation Group Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FANNING v. DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
DYNCORP TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC and COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joles et al v. Computer Sciences Corporation
as 1:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Joles, Everett C. Lewis, III and Thomas Dobbing
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation and Computer Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Walter Gray et al v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv02409
Plaintiff:
Walter Gray, Don Tyrone Ballard and Jeanine L Shamaly
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation, CSC Retirement and Employee Benefits Plans Committee, Leon J Level and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Petersen v. Computer Sciences Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv03146
Plaintiff:
Janice Petersen
Defendant:
Computer Sciences Corporation, Computer Science Corporation's Long Term Disability Plan, Hartford Life Group Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
