Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 46 of 46
BUSH v. RMS INSURANCE et al
as 1:2008cv01133
Plaintiff: DANA L. BUSH
Defendant: RMS INSURANCE, DISABILITY RMS, DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Gilliland v. American United Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2007cv01820
Plaintiff: Joe Gilliland
Defendant: American United Life Insurance Company, Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc. and MailSouth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Marks v. Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv60722
Plaintiff: David Marks
Defendant: Disability Reinsurance Management Services, Inc., Geoffrey L. Randall, Randall Equities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
FAGAN-ELLISON v. DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00422
Plaintiff: SHARON FAGAN-ELLISON
Defendant: DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE INC., INDYGO LONGTERM DISABILITY PLAN and BOSTON MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Baker v. United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York The et al
as 3:2007cv00107
Plaintiff: Michael Baker
Defendant: United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York The and Disability Reinsurance Management Services Inc
Counter Claimant: United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York The
Counter Defendant: Michael Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal-ERISA
Longazel v. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00022
Plaintiff: Mark F. Longazel
Defendant: Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company, Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company, Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?