Cases 41 - 50 of 676
Marshall v. Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC
as 5:2021cv00762
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marshall
Defendant:
Castle & Cooke Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MARSHALL v. NATIONAL MAINTENANCE & BUILD OUT COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03275
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARSHALL
Defendant:
NATIONAL MAINTENANCE & BUILD OUT COMPANY, LLC doing business as NMBOC and JOHN FOLZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marshall v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2021cv11467
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Melanie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Minor v. Marshalls of CA, LLC
as 4:2021cv04492
Plaintiff:
Shaun Minor
Defendant:
Marshalls of CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Agricon Equipment Company, LLC
as 5:2021cv00290
Plaintiff:
Marshall Johnson and Juana Johnson
Defendant:
Agricon Equipment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
BROWDER v. E&S COMMUNICATIONS, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv80337
Defendant:
E&S COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, SAMANTHA R QUIMBY and ELLIJAH D SCHAEFFER
Plaintiff:
Zachary McKinney, DANIEL BROWDER, Jordan Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
McNeff et al v. McNeff et al
as 2:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Daniel McNeff, Martin Evans, Seiler Anderson Fife and Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew McNeff and Ammon McNeff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chris Thompson, Byron Marshall, Cory Heckard and others
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marshall v. Etairos Health, Inc.
as 6:2021cv00001
Defendant:
ETAIROS HEALTH, INC. doing business as UTOPIA HOME CARE
Plaintiff:
RANICKY MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marshall v. Etairos Health, Inc.
as 8:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Etairos Health, Inc. doing business as Utopia Home Care
Plaintiff:
Ranicky Marshall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
