Cases 51 - 60 of 203
Mullins v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2018cv11869
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Mullins
Mullins v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2018cv11791
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Mullins
Gibson et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
William Egbert Gibson and Judy Arlene Gibson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Conduent Inc., Xerox HR Solutions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Thomas v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2017cv14210
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Craig Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dye v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2017cv08828
Plaintiff:
Rollin Dye, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Rollin Dye
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2017cv00997
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Renee Hill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Cornwell v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2017cv00710
Plaintiff:
Steven Cornwell
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Adams v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2017cv13042
Defendant:
VP Human Resources Felicia Fields, Ford Motor Company, Jimmy Settles and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Adams v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2017cv13048
Defendant:
Felicia Fields, Ford Motor Company, James Settles, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Adams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Sinishtaj v. Ford Motor Company General Retirment Plan et al
as 2:2017cv12761
Plaintiff:
Julie Sinishtaj
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company General Retirment Plan and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
