Cases 61 - 70 of 76
Guzman v. Jade Restoration Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv05119
Plaintiff:
Jose Rodolfo Cordova Guzman
Defendant:
Jade Restoration Corp. and John O'Reilly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Martinez v. House Incorporated Lucky Jade et al
as 1:2011cv06016
Plaintiff:
Victor Bazan Martinez
Defendant:
House Incorporated Lucky Jade and Alex Xu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McClean et al v. Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv03037
Plaintiff:
Jade McClean and Jamie Davis
Defendant:
Health Systems, Inc. , Forsyth Manor, Inc. , Current River Nursing Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Sanusi v. Jade Eatery & Lounge LLC et al
as 1:2010cv04759
Defendant:
Jade Eatery & Lounge LLC and Sam Kandhorov
Plaintiff:
David Ongko Sanusi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Thornton v. Jade Quality Care, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv02687
Plaintiff:
Camilla Thornton
Defendant:
Jade Quality Care, Inc. and Deannettia White
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Celestino Martinez v. Jade Palace
as 10-13390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CELESTINO ANTONIO MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JADE PALACE
v. Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds et al
as 1:2010cv00213
Plaintiff:
Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds
Defendant:
Jade Construction, LLC, John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Celestino Antonio Martinez v. Jade Palace
as 10-10287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CELESTINO ANTONIO MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JADE PALACE
Jue v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 3:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jade Jue, Jade Jue, Jade Jue and others
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Corporation, Costco Wholesale Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
