Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Ochsner Health System et al
as 2:2017cv09899
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Smith
Defendant:
Ochsner Health System and Ochsner Clinic Foundation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0207
Smith v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2015cv02868
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Smith
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trinidad et al v. The Hearty Boys Caterers, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv09346
Plaintiff:
Uriel Trinidad and Juan Trinidad
Defendant:
The Hearty Boys Caterers, Inc. and Daniel J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez
as 12-2188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William F. Raedle
Defendant - Appellee:
Credit Agricole Indosuez, Daniel H. Smith and Lee Shaiman
Joseph Craft, et al v. Ray's LLC, et al
as 11-3467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH L. CRAFT, DANIEL J. SMITH and RANDY L. HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY'S LLC and DONALD MATTHEWS
Osterman et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv03220
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Osterman, Michael G Osterman and Debra S Osterman
Defendant:
Danielle N Smith, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey and ACS Recovery Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Greene et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A
as 3:2010cv03466
Plaintiff:
Irasema E. Greene , Karyn Rae Winn , Jarrod D. Osborne and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez
as 10-2734
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
William F. Raedle
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel H. Smith
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Credit Agricole Indosuez and Lee Shaiman
Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez
as 10-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William F. Raedle
Defendant - Appellee:
Credit Agricole Indosuez, Daniel H. Smith and Lee Shaiman
Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez
as 10-1512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William F. Raedle
Defendant - Appellee:
Credit Agricole Indosuez, Daniel H. Smith and Lee Shaiman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
