Cases 1 - 6 of 6
McCoy v. RPM Management Group Inc et al
as 2:2014cv03171
Plaintiff:
Tyler McCoy
Defendant:
RPM Management Group Inc , RPM James Island Inc , RPM Summerville Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Sysco Food Service Chicago
as 1:2012cv08190
Plaintiff:
David A. Miller
Defendant:
Sysco Food Service Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
David Miller v. Dept. of Economic Development, et al
as 11-2551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David E. Miller
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Nebraska Department of Economic Development, an agency of the State of Nebraska, Richard Baier, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Economic Development for the State of Nebraska, Gary Hamer, Individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the Department of Economic Development for the State of Nebraska and others
Manuel Santillan et al v. Specialized Construction Site & Services Inc et al
as 4:2009cv02366
Plaintiff:
Manuel Santillan, Manuel Santillan, Eduardo Dimas-Medina and others
Defendant:
Specialized Construction Site & Services Inc, Specialized Construction Site & Services Inc, Keith Mercure and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Miller v. State of Nebraska Department of Economic Development et al
as 4:2009cv03098
Plaintiff:
David E. Miller
Defendant:
State of Nebraska Department of Economic Development, Richard Baier, Gary Hamer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
The Trustees of the Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Fringe Benefit Funds v. Mid-Dakota Masonry, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv03712
Plaintiff:
The Trustees of the Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant:
Mid-Dakota Masonry, Inc. and David A Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
