Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Spiesel v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 8:2024cv02246
Defendant:
Denis MdDonough Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Julie Spiesel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Georgette Sherman v. Denis McDonough
as 24-2295
Defendant:
United States of America and Denis McDonough, Secretary, United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Georgette Sherman
Chester v. McDonough et al
as 3:2023cv02610
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Chester
Defendant:
Denis McDonough and Department of Veterans Affairs
Wade v. Department of Veteran Affairs et al
as 1:2023cv20182
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Wade
Defendant:
Department of Veteran Affairs, Passion L Sullivan, Kalautie S. Janghari and others
Tatyana Drevaleva v. USDVA, et al
as 22-16735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DENIS MCDONOUGH, in his Official Capacity as an Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Salmon v. McDonough et al
as 3:2022cv01207
Plaintiff:
Sandra Salmon
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, Ryan Lilly, Alfred A Montoya and others
Skrettas v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2022cv11439
Plaintiff:
George Dimitrios Skrettas
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis McDonough
CONNALLY v. United States Department of Veteran Affairs
as 2:2022cv10236
Plaintiff:
LATONYA CONNALLY
Defendant:
United States Department of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Bennett v. McDonough
as 8:2021cv02018
Plaintiff:
Lee Bennett
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis R. McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Drevaleva v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Peter O'Rourke and Robert Wilkie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
