Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Thurston v. Sound Physicians Anesthesiology of Texas, PLLC
as 4:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Lorenzo Thurston and John L. Thurston, MD
Defendant:
Sound Physicians Anesthesiology of Texas, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Toler v. Krell et al
as 3:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Sadie Toler
Defendant:
Dr. Blair Krell and Brazoria Neurological Associates, P.A.
Bran v. Waterfront Family Dentistry, PLLC et al
as 4:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
Manuela Bran
Defendant:
Waterfront Family Dentistry, PLLC and Dr. Rudrapatna Lavanya
May v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00718
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ruth C May and Dr Ruth C May
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rathert v. Dr. Detail, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv03779
Defendant:
Dr. Detail, LLC and Harold Starnes
Plaintiff:
Bron Rathert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ngo et al v. Global Institute of Spine & Joint Care LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00997
Plaintiff:
Maria Mercedes Jimenez and Michelle Ngo
Defendant:
Dr. Vivek Mehta and Global Institute of Spine & Joint Care LLC
Weeks v. Lamar University - Beaumont et al
as 1:2019cv00438
Defendant:
Texas State University System and Lamar University - Beaumont
Plaintiff:
Dr. Kelly Weeks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2019cv01231
Defendant:
Mike NLN, Nicholas NLN, Victoria NLN and others
Plaintiff:
Nadia Lofton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Keurig Dr Pepper Inc
as 3:2019cv00861
Plaintiff:
Randy Watson
Defendant:
Keuring Dr Pepper Inc., Keurig Dr Pepper Inc and The American Bottling Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Shea v. Management and Training Corporation
as 1:2018cv00830
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dr. Graham Shea, DDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
