Cases 1 - 10 of 467
Pan American Grain Manufacturing v. National Labor Relations Board
as 3:2024cv01274
Plaintiff:
Pan American Grain Manufacturing
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sacks v. I.N.S.A., Inc.
as 24-1569
Petitioner:
LAURA A. SACKS, Regional Director, Region 1, National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
I.N.S.A., INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
NLRB v. Wilton Rancheria
as 2:2024cv01477
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Wilton Rancheria
NLRB v. BGM Co. Inc.
as 2:2024cv01476
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
BGM Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Sawyer v. Big Green
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
PAULA S. SAWYER, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board,
Defendant:
BIG GREEN
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1032
Petitioner:
MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner:
MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
National Labor Relations Board v. Metro Man IV
as 2:2023cv13307
Applicant:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Metro Man IV d/b/a Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. and Metro Man IV Doing business as Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation Center, Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
