Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sain v. Transcanada USA Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02921
Plaintiff:
Todd Sain
Defendant:
Transcanada USA Services, Inc. and Onshore Quality Control Specialists, LLC.
Johnson et al v. Onshore Quality Control Specialist, LLC
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sammy Johnson and Michael Maness
Defendant:
Onshore Quality Control Specialist, LLC
Robertson v. Onshore Quality Control Specialists, LLC
as 1:2019cv00803
Defendant:
Onshore Quality Control Specialists, LLC
Plaintiff:
Zachariah Robertson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. BRAUNSBERG et al
as 5:2014cv06185
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
DAVID BRAUNSBERG, QUALITY CONTROL PATTERN & MODEL, INC. and QUALITY CONTROL PATTERN & MODEL, INC. SIMPLE IRA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ACEVEDO PARRA v. QUALITY CONTROLLED CONCRETE, LLC
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
JUAN ACEVEDO PARRA
Defendant:
QUALITY CONTROLLED CONCRETE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quality Control Council of The United States et al v. Acuren USA, Inc.
as 2:2013cv02566
Plaintiff:
Quality Control Council of The United States , Non-Destructive Testing Communications and Productivity Fund , Non-Destructive Evaluation Joint Training Fund Trust and others
Defendant:
Acuren USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Quality Control Council of The United States et al v. Jan X-Ray Services
as 2:2009cv02022
Plaintiff:
Quality Control Council of The United States, Quality Control Council of The United States, Non-Destructive Testing Communications and Productivity Fund and others
Defendant:
Jan X-Ray Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Quality Control Council of The United States et al v. Integrated Quality Services, Inc.
as 2:2008cv02530
Plaintiff:
Quality Control Council of The United States, Quality Control Council of The United States, Non-Destructive Testing Communications and Productivity Fund and others
Defendant:
Integrated Quality Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
