Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Martinez v. Iqbal et al
as 2:2024cv01792
Plaintiff:
Rafael Alberto Martinez
Defendant:
Gul K. Iqbal, Raja Iqbal, Rollie's Smoke Shop and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ventura v. RKB Above, Inc. et. al.
as 1:2021cv05830
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ventura
Defendant:
RKB Above, Inc. doing business as Rolly Kimbab, James Kang and Jung Hyun Kang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ventura v. RKB Above, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05830
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ventura
Defendant:
RKB Above, Inc. doing business as Rolly Kimbab, James Kang and Jung Hyun Kang
Central Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. Rollie Excavating & Cement Finishing, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00419
Plaintiff:
Central Laborers' Pension Supplement, Southern Illinois Laborers' Annuity Fund, Southern Illinois Laborers' Work Dues and others
Defendant:
Rollie Excavating & Cement Finishing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Evans v. United States Department of Labor
as 1:2017cv02365
Plaintiff:
Rollis Evans
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
RODRIGUEZ v. TOKASH ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv05217
Plaintiff:
ROLLY RODRIGUEZ and CHRISTIAN ARRAYA
Defendant:
TOKASH ENTERPRISES, INC., GILLETTE AMOCO, INC., ROBERT TOKASH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Local 84 Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, et al v. DST Insulation, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00439
Plaintiff:
Local 84 Asbestos Workers Pension Fund, Local 84 Asbestos Workers Annuity Fund, Al Strodtbeck and others
Defendant:
DST Insulation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cranney et al v. Carriage Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv01587
Plaintiff:
Spencer Cranney, Amos Mitchell, Catherine Samuelson and others
Defendant:
Carriage Services, Inc., Carriage Funeral Holdings, Inc., CFS Funeral Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
