Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Singh v. Indian Farmer Express Inc et al
as 1:2023cv09603
Plaintiff:
Sarbjit Singh
Defendant:
Indian Farmer Express Inc and Skyblue Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bastian v. Abrams Gas Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
Shelley Bastian
Defendant:
Abrams Gas Inc., Velp Gas Inc. and Sarbjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez et al v. Sunny & KP Construction Corp et al
as 1:2020cv08649
Defendant:
kuldip Singh, Xinos Construction Corp, Sarbjit Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Mezquita, Mario Sanchez and Nano Batista
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
William Pearson v. Frequency Car Audio #1, L.L.C., et al
as 17-20769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #1, L.L.C., FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #2, L.L.C., FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #3, L.L.C. and others
Pearson v. FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #1 LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00415
Defendant:
FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #1 LLC , FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #2 LLC , FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #3 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Pearson
Counter_claimant:
AJIT S KHALSA , FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #1 LLC , FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #3 LLC and others
Counter_defendant:
William Pearson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Mullikin et al v. Money Sodhi LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01476
Plaintiff:
Bernie Mullikin and Kevin Nelson
Defendant:
Money Sodhi LLC, NYSBV Investment LLC, Sarbjit Singh Sodhi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Meador v. Frequency Car Audio #2 et al
as 4:2014cv01923
Plaintiff:
John Edward Meador, II
Defendant:
Frequency Car Audio #2 , Ajit Singh Khalsa and Sarbjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CONTI et al v. FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #1 LLC et al
as 4:2013cv02632
Plaintiff:
TAMARA L CONTI and TYVIS T MOORE
Defendant:
FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #1 LLC , FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #2 LLC , FREQUENCY CAR AUDIO #3 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
