Cases 91 - 100 of 142
PIERCE v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00609
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LAUREL G. PIERCE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pierce v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00032
Petitioner:
Ronald J Pierce
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pierce v. Superintendent
as 3:2016cv00031
Petitioner:
Ronald J Pierce
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PIERCE v. AAR CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN et al
as 1:2016cv00055
Defendant:
AAR CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
PIERCE v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00304
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA
Petitioner:
DALTON DEVON PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AMERICAN MODERN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN MODERN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
SARAH PIERCE, CATHY WEST and DAVID WEST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CLE REQUIREMENTS . . .
as 1:2015mc00049
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Respondent:
MICHELE RENE IGNEY, GARY LEE ROYER, HOLLY DEMAREST WARSHAUER and others
WANG v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2014cv00350
Defendant:
HOMER ABRAMS, RICHARD T. COLVIN and TERRY D. PIERCE
Plaintiff:
YA-FENG WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WANG v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2014cv01487
Defendant:
COLVIN, JOHN DOE and TERRY D. PIERCE
Plaintiff:
YA-FENG WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELL v. IVY TECHNICAL COLLEGE et al
as 1:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
CAMILLE BELL
Defendant:
IVY TECHNICAL COLLEGE and HEATHER CROSS PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
