Cases 91 - 100 of 199
Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission LLC v. 2.474 Acres et al
as 6:2017cv00861
Plaintiff:
Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission LLC
Defendant:
2.474 Acres, Charles P Roark, Adair R Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Watson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Shelia Watson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sharal Scully et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03466
Plaintiff:
Sharal Scully , Vernell Davis , Johnnie Mae Dorsey and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerrold A Watson & Sons LLC v. CH Robinson Company
as 8:2016cv02833
Plaintiff:
Jerrold A Watson & Sons LLC
Defendant:
CH Robinson Company
Counter_claimant:
CH Robinson Company
Counter_defendant:
Jerrold A Watson & Sons LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laney v. Watson et al
as 1:2016cv02215
Plaintiff:
Bill Laney
Defendant:
Gwen Watson , Channell Thompson , Matthew Kennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Watson Financial LLC v. Dusaules
as 6:2016cv01718
Plaintiff:
Richard Watson Financial LLC
Defendant:
Candace Dusaules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Watson v. Medtronic Inc
as 8:2016cv01453
Plaintiff:
Travis Watson
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Watson v. USA
as 4:2016cv01324
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory Kewon Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2015cv04935
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Watson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Watson v. SC Telco Federal Credit Union et al
as 8:2015cv03498
Plaintiff:
William Watson, Jr
Defendant:
SC Telco Federal Credit Union, Stonebrook Recovery Services LLC and Billy Fulbright
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.