Cases 91 - 100 of 1,471
Scott v. Jones et al
as 6:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Marcus Scott and Marcus Scott Bey
Defendant:
Unknown Jones, Albert Arnold, Sgt Larry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Clarke, et al.
as 5:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Defendant:
Judge Ron Clarke, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00511
Petitioner:
Premium Warez Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
Premium Warez Clark
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendrix v Lee & Murphy Law Firm G.P., et al
as 4:2023cv01946
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hendrix
Defendant:
Lee and Murphy Law Firm G.P., Erin Murphy, Clark, Love and Hutson G.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dressen et al v Flaherty et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ernest Ramirez, Brianne Dressen, Shaun Barcavage and others
Defendant:
Rob Flaherty, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Clark v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Clark
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Clark
as 4:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Toney Jones
Defendant:
John Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Papa Texas, LLC
as 4:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Miracle Harris, Albert Clark and Lucas Sweeney
Defendant:
Papa Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
