Cases 91 - 100 of 1,400
Woosley v. USA
as 5:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
James E. Woosley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. Althauser et al
as 7:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
E. Althauser and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Ferguson
as 1:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
Randall E. Banks
Respondent:
Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
T.E. v. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield et al
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
T. E.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Stoll Keenon Ogden and Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Compton v. SSA
as 7:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Keith E. Compton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clervrain et al v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Niva Guerrier, Woodny Lormil and others
Defendant:
Raul L. Ortiz, AnnMarie Highsmith, Benjamine Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFarland et al v. Scott
as 7:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Sharon B. McFarland and Joseph Craig Reynolds
Defendant:
Timothy E. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Henson v. C.A.R. Transport, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Courtney Henson
Defendant:
C.A.R. Transport, Inc. and Jonathan E. Farmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
