Cases 91 - 100 of 2,478
Jackson-Grant v. USA
as 4:2023cv00866
Petitioner:
Corie Jackson-Grant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson v. Arlington Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
William Jackson
Defendant:
Arlington Police Department, Wells Fargo Bank, Haltom City Civil Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Burgess et al
as 4:2023cv03228
Plaintiff:
Scott Martin
Defendant:
Marilyn Burgess, Judge Shannon Baldwin, Judge Genesis Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo v. Jackson et al
as 4:2023cv03240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Castillo
Defendant:
Darrell Delane Jackson and BCPE Empire Topco, Inc. doing business as Imperial Bag & Paper Co. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01934
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson et al v. AmCap Mortgage Ltd. et al
as 4:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Jackson and Superior Consulting Group
Defendant:
AmCap Mortgage Ltd. and Planet Home Lending
Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB et al v. Jackson
as 4:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB AS TRUSTEE OF WV 2017-1 GRANTOR TRUST and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Defendant:
Woodrow Wilson Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00172
Petitioner:
Don Carnel Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hyder v. Ivey et al
as 4:2023cv03090
Plaintiff:
Calvin Hyder
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Ivey, Warden Billy Jackson and Warden Dan Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
