Cases 91 - 100 of 1,025
Walker v. CNN Studio Tours et al
as 1:2022cv02716
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
CNN Studio Tours, MSNBC News, CBS 2 News and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walker v. Amazon Corporate et al
as 1:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Amazon Corporate, Amazon Distribution Center and Amazon Fulfillment Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Aaron et al
as 5:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Stewart D. Aaron, Sharon Seeley, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thornburgh
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Abe Eisenstat and others
Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thornburgh
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Abe Eisenstat and others
Walker v. Tulare County Main Jail Prison et al
as 1:2022cv02372
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Tulare County Main Jail Prison, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department Department, Charlotte Meckenburg Main Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Carter et al
as 1:2022cv02371
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Shawn Jay-Z Carter, Tauheedepps, Sean John Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Jack in the Box Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02369
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Jack in the Box Inc. and SoJourners Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Kings County Hospital
as 1:2022cv02370
Plaintiff:
Ross Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Kings County Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
