Cases 91 - 100 of 109
v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leah A Weaver, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc, Pathfinder Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
United States of America v. Weaver et al
as 1:2009cv00105
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leah A Weaver, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc, Pathfinder Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
WEAVER et al v. OPEN DOOR/BHM HEALTH CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
JEREMY WEAVER, TONI GRADDY-WEAVER and L.G.W.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HALL v. BUSS et al
as 1:2009cv00403
Plaintiff:
DENNIS L. HALL
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, BRENT MIZE, THOMAS HANLON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WEAVER POPCORN, INC. v. PRIVACY PROTECTION SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2009cv00400
Plaintiff:
WEAVER POPCORN, INC. and WEAVER POPCORN, INC.
Defendant:
PRIVACY PROTECTION SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weaver-Shelton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Arlene Weaver-Shelton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EDWARDS ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL, INC. v. DEEM, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01717
Plaintiff:
EDWARDS ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL, INC.
Defendant:
DEEM, LLC, GARY EDWARDS, CHAD JONES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weaver v. Superintendant
as 3:2008cv00395
Petitioner:
Anthony Weaver
Respondent:
Superintendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
