Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Whitworth v. Keller
as 1:2009cv00407
Petitioner:
Anthony Andrea Whitworth
Respondent:
Alvin W. Keller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MICHAUX v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00769
Petitioner:
NAOMI MICHAUX
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IVEY v. KELLER et al
as 1:2009cv00831
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LARRY IVEY
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., LEWIS F. SMITH and SAMI HASSAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMPTON-BEY v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00777
Petitioner:
JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTON-BEY
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENNETT v. MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 1:2009cv00769
Petitioner:
EDWIN A. BENNETT, JR.
Respondent:
MAURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLOTT v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00628
Petitioner:
MICKEY W. PLOTT, JR.
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00541
Petitioner:
IAN AULDEN CAMPBELL
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONTEHERMOSO v. KELLER et al
as 1:2009cv00519
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., BOB LEWIS, BROWN-RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTEHERMOSO v. KELLER et al
as 1:2009cv00469
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., BOB LEWIS, BROWN-RAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00415
Petitioner:
ANDRE LEVERN MILLER
Respondent:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
