Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 91 - 100 of 798
Ousta v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02898
Plaintiff: Anthony Ousta
Defendant: 3M Company
Washington v. City of St. Paul et al
as 0:2022cv02899
Plaintiff: Joseph Washington
Defendant: City of St. Paul, Anthony Dean, Colleen Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chestnut et al v. Klund et al
as 0:2022cv02714
Plaintiff: Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes, Charles Nguyen Thorstad and others
Defendant: Darcy Klund, Michael Kennedy, Joseph Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Chestnut et al
as 0:2022cv02712
Plaintiff: Marvin Lewis Chestnut, Lawrence Anthony Barnes and Charles Nguyen Thorstad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02682
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Arena v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02677
Plaintiff: Anthony Arena
Defendant: 3M Company
Scott v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02503
Plaintiff: Anthonie Scott
Defendant: 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Arrington v. Street et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02362
Plaintiff: Gideon C. Arrington, II
Defendant: Dyanna L. Street, Anthony C. Palumbo, Wade A. Kish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Watson v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2022cv02266
Plaintiff: Anthony Michael Watson
Defendant: Hennepin County, Nick Peterson and J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunlap v. Minnesota Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv02216
Petitioner: Troy Anthony Dunlap
Respondent: Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?