Cases 91 - 100 of 231
McNabb v. SSA
as 1:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Lisa Riden McNabb
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, US Attorney and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Cranmer v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00725
Petitioner:
James R Cranmer
Respondent:
Debra Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malott et al v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
John Malott and Michelle Malott
Defendant:
Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vantrease v. Westbrooks et al
as 2:2015cv00072
Petitioner:
Earl Vantrease, Jr.
Respondent:
Bruce Westbrooks and Attorney General for Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frith v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2015cv02761
Plaintiff:
Ricky Frith
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County, District Attorney General Ofc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. State of Tennessee Governor et al
as 2:2015cv02701
Plaintiff:
Stratton Kearney
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Governor, Attorney General of this State, Tennessee Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. United States Attorney General
as 1:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Eric Flores
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Lee et al
as 2:2015cv00278
Petitioner:
Douglas Wayne Young
Respondent:
Randy Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Lee et al
as 2:2015mc00013
Petitioner:
Douglas Wayne Young
Respondent:
Randy Lee and The Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Kinslow v. Chapman
as 3:2015cv00429
Petitioner:
Battrick D Kinslow
Respondent:
Arvil Chapman and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
