Cases 91 - 100 of 143
Pullen et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv11081
Plaintiff:
Montel Pullen , Sharnell Grandberry , Dominique Stewart and others
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation , McDonald's USA, LLC and ECS Partnership
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rangel v. Rios et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Adrian G. Rangel
Defendant:
Scott Rios, Unknown Party, Northern Michigan District of the Wesleyan Church Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Romulus Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv10196
Plaintiff:
Brian Bonner
Defendant:
Romulus Police Department, Haynes, Perkins and others
Berryman et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2013cv12403
Plaintiff:
Philip Berryman, James F Crawford, David Lytal and others
Defendant:
Adriane Neff, Connie Ives, James Van Summern and others
Adrian Steel Company et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2012cv15614
Plaintiff:
Adrian Steel Company and Adrian Steel Company Basic Life
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan
Kokona et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 2:2012cv15459
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kokona and Marika Kokona
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Gauthier v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2012cv15146
Plaintiff:
Adrian W Gauthier
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Edwards, Jr. et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2012cv13413
Plaintiff:
Omega L. Edwards, Jr. and Adrian Edwards
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zanecki v. Health Alliance Plan of Detroit - Institutional Review Board (HAP IRB) et al
as 2:2012cv13233
Plaintiff:
Mark M Zanecki
Defendant:
Health Alliance Plan of Detroit - Institutional Review Board (HAP IRB) , Institutional Review Board - Henry Ford Hlth System IRB #1 , Timothy Roehrs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
