Cases 91 - 100 of 2,059
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1089
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cullen v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Barker v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark A. Barker
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3612
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cogburn v. WellPath et al
as 4:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Kevin Andrew Cogburn
Defendant:
WellPath, Does ACC Security Staff and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Webster v. Dexter Payne
as 22-3560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Leon Webster
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Parks v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Larry Garone Parks
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Clayton Evens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wormley v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Raomone Wormley
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Jamarvious Jakel Roberts
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
