Cases 91 - 100 of 135
BAKER v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2013cv00940
Petitioner:
RALPH OWEN BAKER
Respondent:
MARY JO WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
THERMAL DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL INC. v. SAFE HAVEN ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00721
Plaintiff:
THERMAL DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL INC.
Defendant:
SAFE HAVEN ENTERPRISES LLC , ALTA BAKER and JOHN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
KALIJARVI, CHUZI, NEWMAN & FITCH, P.C. v. BAKER
as 1:2012cv01127
Plaintiff:
KALIJARVI, CHUZI, NEWMAN & FITCH, P.C.
Defendant:
KELVIN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. PEZZAT et al
as 1:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
MARIETTA ROBINSON
Defendant:
SARAH PEZZAT, CHRISTIAN GLYNN, RICHARD MCLEOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
STATE OF TEXAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01303
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Intervenor_defendant:
WENDY DAVIS , MARC VEASEY , JOHN JENKINS and others
Movant:
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS, TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , GREG GONZALES , LISA AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BAKER v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2011cv00914
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BAKER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BOYD v. WINTERS et al
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant:
GARY WINTERS, W. E. WALKER, M. HOLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
