Cases 91 - 100 of 116
Berry et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02715
Plaintiff:
Marshall Berry , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Alabama Dept. of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
Mernard Berry
Defendant:
Alabama Dept. of Corrections and Kilby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. Pfizer, Inc
as 2:2010cv01124
Plaintiff:
Colin Vivian Hicks and Berri C Hicks
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Muhammad v. Option One Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Bernice Muhammad
Defendant:
Option One Mortgage Corporation, H&R Block Mortgage, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Loan Investore, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Waldrop v. City of Heflin et al
as 1:2009cv00908
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Waldrop, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Heflin and Anna Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
