Cases 91 - 100 of 201
Royster v. Trierweiler
as 2:2017cv10101
Petitioner:
Bryant Lamont Royster
Respondent:
Tony Trierweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
bentley v. Bauman
as 2:2016cv14242
Petitioner:
bryant eugene bentley
Respondent:
Catherine Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv14052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00906
Plaintiff:
Bryant L. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryant v. Omni Healthcare Management Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv12635
Plaintiff:
Krystal Bryant
Defendant:
Omni Healthcare Management Corp., Omni Home Care, Inc., Omni Home Care of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bryant et al v. Omni Healthcare Management Corp. et al
as 2:2016cv12639
Plaintiff:
Krystal Bryant , Laura Gonzalez , Kayla McTaggert and others
Defendant:
Omni Healthcare Management Corp., Omni Home Care, Inc., Omni Home Care of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Anderson et al v. Snyder et al
as 1:2016cv00874
Plaintiff:
Ann Kaufeld , Hilda Mathus , Sylvester Obb, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , Michigan Department of Environmental Quality , Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moses #231885 et al v. Finco et al
as 1:2016cv00248
Plaintiff:
Jamero T. Moses #231885, William Johnson #235820, Lamont Heard #252329 and others
Defendant:
Thomas Finco, David Leach and Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linden et al v. 4283791 Canada et al
as 5:2016cv10803
Defendant:
4283791 Canada, National Cargo Carrier, Inc. and Arif Alacayir
Plaintiff:
Howard T. Linden and Angela Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
