Cases 91 - 100 of 248
Bell v. USA
as 1:2016cv00219
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bernard Milford Bell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bell v. Martin
as 3:2016cv00386
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Bell
Defendant:
M. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jonsha Bell
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00063
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Jordan v. Union Co Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Jordan
Defendant:
Jimmy Edwards, Johnny Bell, Michael Cortez Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almore et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Allen Almore , Solomon Sylvester Barger , Douglas E. Beasley, Sr. and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. McBride et al
as 5:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jerome Kendrell Harris
Defendant:
Paulesha McBride, Hope Denham, Joe Belling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Union Co Sherrifs Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Patrick H. Pierce
Defendant:
Union Co Sherrifs Dept., Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, Jimmy Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbins v. Union County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Robbins
Defendant:
Union County Sheriff Dept., Baron Baker, Brian Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Union County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mullins
Defendant:
Union County Sheriff Dept., Jimmy Edwards, Johnny Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
