Cases 91 - 100 of 974
Bell v. Intergen Health Management
as 1:2022cv07338
Plaintiff:
James Bell
Defendant:
Intergen Health Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. ASMedia Technology, Inc.
as 1:2022cv07307
Plaintiff:
Bell Semiconductor, LLC
Defendant:
ASMedia Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Farrow v. Plante et al
as 1:2022cv07247
Plaintiff:
Justin Farrow
Defendant:
O.R.C. Plante, RCII OMH D. Devereaux, Doctor/Psycharist Ghalani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weng v. Does 1-35 et al
as 1:2022cv07082
Plaintiff:
Weijie Weng
Defendant:
Does 1-35, Zoetop Business Co. Limited, Zhangjiagang Bai Xuan Import and Export Trade Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Mendez v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv06811
Plaintiff:
Hiram Noel Mendez
Defendant:
Reginald J. Johnson, Stephen A. Ronco, Spenser Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06548
Plaintiff:
Richard Bell
Defendant:
Catchmark Timber Trust, Inc., Douglas D. Rubenstein, Tim E. Bentsen and others
Bell v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv04499
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Bell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Putz v. Hospitality Syracuse, Inc.
as 6:2022cv06324
Plaintiff:
Karen Putz
Defendant:
Hospitality Syracuse, Inc. d/b/a Taco Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Burrell v. Bell et al
as 9:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Earl Bell, Webb, Kowlisk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrow v. Cordez et al
as 1:2022cv05952
Plaintiff:
Justin Farrow
Defendant:
C.O. Cordez, Sgt. (In Charge), O.R.C. Szczepanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
