Cases 91 - 100 of 228
Molson v. Caccacus et al
as 1:2018cv01649
Defendant:
Jack Caccacus and Tim Bennett
Plaintiff:
Rowena Molson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Daniel Lee Bennett
as 2:2018mc00038
Respondent:
Daniel Lee Bennett
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Johnson et al v. Corbin
as 3:2018cv01587
Plaintiff:
Deon C. Parker, Dustin C. Burton, Jeremiah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Todd Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Collins v. Bennett et al
as 2:2018cv00592
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Collins
Defendant:
Drake E. Bennett , William M. Hughes and Jeremy R. Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GCIU - Employer Retirement Fund et al v. Bennett-Smith Company et al
as 3:2018cv01270
Plaintiff:
GCIU - Employer Retirement Fund and Board of Trustees of the GCIU - Employer Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Bennett-Smith Company and Edward W. Tellam, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bennett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv00919
Plaintiff:
Robin Bennett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hofer v. Spencer et al
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Hofer
Defendant:
Brett M. Spencer, C. David Kelly, Kristopher Blanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mohr et al
as 3:2017cv02631
Plaintiff:
Clifford T. Johnson
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Neil Turner, Shelly Curry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staples v. Jillerat et al
as 1:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
Rahson Staples
Defendant:
Cody Jillerat, Popp, Neil Roger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEILER v. ALLF et al
as 1:2017cv00673
Plaintiff:
LISA WEILER
Defendant:
CECIL ALLF , BRYAN E ALLF , KEY CARIBE, LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
The Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Foundation , University of Dayton , BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE ST BERNARD-ELMWOOD PLACE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Cross_defendant:
BRYAN E ALLF , CECIL ALLF and KEY CARIBE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
