Cases 91 - 100 of 732
Wilcher v. Warren County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 4:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Charles Herman Wilcher
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff Dept., McMinnville Police Dept., Warren County, Tennesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcher v. Warren County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
Charles Herman Wilcher
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff Dept., McMinnville Police Dept., Warren County, Tennesse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Givens v. State Board of Pardons and Par, et al
as 17-11765
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY GIVENS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E. BARNARD, Chairman, JAMES W. MILLS, Vice Chairman and others
Berry v. Johnson et al
as 5:2017cv00039
Plaintiff:
Delwin Berry
Defendant:
Bryson Edwina Johnson, Ammos Taylor, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Berry v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
Delwin Berry
Defendant:
Bryson Edwina Johnson, Ammos Taylor, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Bryson et al
as 5:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Delwin Berry
Defendant:
Bryson, Edwina Johnson, Ammos Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. Homer Bryson, et al
as 17-11418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOMER BRYSON, Commissioner, BRIAN OWENS, Former Commissioner, TIMOTHY WARD, Assistant Commissioner and others
William Cobb, Jr. v. Brian Owens
as 17-11298
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. COBB, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS
Daniel Cobble v. Pete Smith, et al
as 16-17074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant - Appellee:
PETE SMITH, U.S. GOVERNMENT and BRIAN OWENS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.