Cases 91 - 100 of 246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
BRACKENS v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 4:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRACKENS
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
LINDSEY v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2018cv00466
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN and PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ADRIANNE LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wakley et al v. Kammeyer et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Victor Wakley, Julie Wakley and Devon Wakley
Defendant:
W Randall Kammeyer, Krista Kammeyer Motter , JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00049
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02874
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
IN RE: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
as 1:2017mc00069
Petitioner:
BADLANDS NGLS LLC
In Re:
MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ISSUED TO NON-PARTY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03412
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
