Cases 91 - 100 of 352
NEWTON v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL NEWTON
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, CAPTAIN BRITT, TWANKEISH CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. SHAW et al
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
KEVIN W. JACKSON
Defendant:
SHERIFF VAN SHAW, SGT. MATHEW PARIS, JOHN LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMERSON v. BELGER et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
TERRY KEITH SIMERSON
Defendant:
BELGER, JAIL FINANCE, MARY CINDY JOEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Hughes et al
as 5:2022ct03143
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Chip Hughes, Jerry Monet, Clerk of Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Murr
as 5:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Wanda Marie Allen
Defendant:
Captain Murr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. City of Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Wanda Marie Allen
Defendant:
City of Raleigh Police Department and Captain Murr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. City of Raleigh Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Wanda Marie Allen
Defendant:
City of Raleigh Police Department and Captain Murr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDuffie v. Wade et al
as 5:2022ct03112
Plaintiff:
Toby M. McDuffie, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Wade, Nurse Nikki and Captain Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
