Cases 91 - 100 of 108
Huynh v. City of Worcester, et al
as 11-1070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUNG HUYNH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF WORCESTER, ANDREW CRAVEDI, Worcester Police Officer and WILLIAM MOSLEY, Worcester Police Officer
Pineiro v. Gemme et al
as 4:2010cv40262
Plaintiff:
Hector E. Pineiro
Defendant:
Gary J. Gemme and City of Worcester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carpenter v. Rivera et al
as 4:2010cv40233
Plaintiff:
Ron Carpenter
Defendant:
Samuel Rivera , Robert Johnson , Michael Mulvey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parks v. Town of Leicester et al
as 4:2010cv30120
Plaintiff:
Dawn Parks
Defendant:
Town of Leicester , City of Worcester , Joseph Fontaine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parks v. Leicester et al
as 3:2010cv30120
Plaintiff:
Dawn Parks
Defendant:
Town of Leicester , City of Worcester , Joseph Fontaine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. McGee et al
as 4:2010cv40095
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hayes
Defendant:
Darnell McGee , James O'Rourke , Kenneth Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warren v. Smith et al
as 4:2009cv40217
Plaintiff:
Katie Warren and Katie Warren
Defendant:
Kellen Smith, Gary Gemme, Michael V. O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Fontanez et al v. Pires et al
as 4:2009cv40203
Plaintiff:
Tanika Fontanez, Jarmil Tharpe and Kaamil Jenkins
Defendant:
Danielle Pires, Sean Baxter, Deborah Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muniz v. Carmody et al
as 1:2009cv11950
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Muniz
Defendant:
James Carmody, Carmello Oquendo and City of Worcester, Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Muniz v. Carmody et al
as 4:2009cv11950
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Muniz
Defendant:
James Carmody, Carmello Oquendo, City of Worcester, Massachusetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
