Cases 91 - 100 of 525
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01048
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area (Diablo) et al
as 3:2020cv03368
Defendant:
City of Concord, Jose A. Espinoza, Darryl R. Saffold and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Dilbert v. CDCR et al
as 1:2020cv00655
Defendant:
R. Fisher and CDCR
Plaintiff:
Clifford Alan Dilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford J. Smith v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2020cv00955
Defendant:
County of Riverside, March Joint Powers Authority and Meridian Park LLC
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Clifford P. Turner v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 2:2020cv02047
Plaintiff:
Clifford P Turner
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clifford Harrison v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv01638
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harrison, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Carol A. Harrison (Deceased) and Clifford Harrison
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Johnson and Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GP Vincent II v. Mayhew Center, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00745
Defendant:
Dean Dunivan, Etch-Tek, Inc., Mayhew Centre Investors, LP and others
Plaintiff:
GP Vincent II
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00728
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linn et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00666
Plaintiff:
Clifford Linn, John Gregorio and Baxter Gipson
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
