Cases 91 - 100 of 171
PENNINGER v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv01391
Defendant:
ABBASSI, J. RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JASON D. PENNINGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2019cv00156
Respondent:
W/V/C/F, STATE OF INDIANA and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Petitioner:
ALBERT BOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Starr v. Indiana Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Indiana Dept of Corrections, Plainfield Correctional Facility's Mental Health Dept and Plainfield Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Chanse T Starr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWISHER v. BROWN
as 2:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SWISHER
Defendant:
GRAGE, INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and DICK BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. State of Indiana et al
as 3:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Gov. State Of Indiana, Dept. Of Corrections Commissioner, Sharon Hawk and others
Plaintiff:
David R Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv00790
Defendant:
GOV. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER, SHARON HAWK and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEINBERG v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN H. STEINBERG
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, KIMBERLY HOBSON, JACKIE WEST DENNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
as 2:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
ANTWION CARTER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Indiana Dept. of Correction et al
as 3:2018cv00992
Defendant:
Indiana Dept. of Correction, Officer Heagwood, Indiana State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
William L White, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAPER v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA, GOVERNOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST DRAPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
