Cases 91 - 100 of 208
Smith v. Diggins
as 1:2020cv01593
Petitioner:
Alan Smith
Respondent:
Diggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
O'Leary v. College of the Holy Cross et al
as 3:2020cv00616
Defendant:
Patrick Joseph Diggins and College of the Holy Cross
Plaintiff:
Margaret O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77202
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv48578
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
REGINALD DIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIGGINS v. HALLFORD
as 3:2020cv05253
Defendant:
WILLIAM HALLFORD
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 20-1097
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK FIRMAN, S.P. ZARNOW, JOHN HICKENLOOPER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE ROBINSON
Mishigamma Moors, et al v. Canton Police Department, et al
as 20-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
PETE ALESTRA, Police Officer, JASON BLICKENSDORF, Detective, JOSHUA MEIER, Public Safety Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERREON LEKEPH BAKER EL, ex rel. Derreon Lekeph Baker, DANIYAL KA RHI GRADY EL, ex rel. Daniel Eugene Grady, AMARI ANN GWENNET DIGGINS EL, ex rel. Ann Gwennet Diggins and others
Plaintiff:
MISHIGAMMA MOORS
DIGGINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13829
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mishigamma Moors et al v. Canton Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv10361
Plaintiff:
Amari Ann Gwennet Diggins El, Derreon Lekeph Baker El, Sha'Teina Anahita Lin Grady El and others
Defendant:
Jacob Krogmeier, Pete Alestra, Canton Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
