Cases 91 - 100 of 1,239
Obot v. Department of Defense
as 1:2022cv02312
Petitioner:
Godwin Obot
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
BABANGA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24764
Plaintiff:
MODEST GODWIN BABANGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GODWIN et al v. WILSON-PERRY et al
as 5:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Linda Godwin, mark godwin and Attorney Lance Berry
Defendant:
Haley Lynn Wilson-Perry, Jack Dewayne Condon, MITNOR CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Godwin v. Godwin et al
as 1:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Godwin
Defendant:
Glyn J. Godwin, Gerard Ruth, Charles Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION OF OHIO v. MINICK et al
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION OF OHIO
Defendant:
DANIEL MARK MINICK, MARK MINICK, MINICK INTERIORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
GODWIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23647
Plaintiff:
JASMINE GODWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Omoile v. Emefiele
as 3:2022cv02638
Plaintiff:
John Omoile
Defendant:
Godwin Emefiele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
GS Holistic, LLC v. Herbal Squire et al
as 2:2022cv08491
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Herbal Squire doing business as Hollywood Cigar and Godwin Ali
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
MUSINGUZI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23357
Plaintiff:
GODWIN MUSINGUZI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
