Cases 91 - 100 of 421
Keith Amaral et al v. Google Inc.
as 5:2016cv02553
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Amaral , Nanor Aghamal , Jonathon Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Doe 1 v. Google Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
Doe 1
Defendant:
Google Inc. and Jeh Charles Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In re Subpoena to Google, Inc.
as 3:2016mc80064
Defendant:
Subpoena to Google, Inc.
Petitioner:
Martha's Music for the services of William P. Corgan doing business as the Smash Pumpkins Cinderful Music as publishing designee of William P. Corgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Erick Debanff v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00403
Plaintiff:
Erick Debanff
Defendant:
Does and Google, Inc.
Jones v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00714
Plaintiff:
Albert C Jones
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., ASUSTeK Computer Inc, ASUS Computer International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
E TV Networks Inc v. Google Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00874
Defendant:
Marvin I Allen, Achouri Mohamed Amine, Mike Boane and others
Plaintiff:
E TV Networks Inc
Ryan Corley et al v. Google, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ryan Corley, Samuel Frank, Nicholas Corpuz and others
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and Google, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Love v. Google, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00290
Plaintiff:
Darlene Love
Defendant:
Google, Inc. and 72 & Sunny, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 5:2016mc80012
Plaintiff:
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC.
Miscellaneou:
Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Abu Maisa, Inc. v. Flint Mobile, Inc et al
as 3:2015cv06338
Plaintiff:
Abu Maisa, Inc.
Defendant:
Flint Mobile, Inc, Google, Inc., Intuit, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.