Cases 91 - 100 of 201
Graham v. USA
as 5:2017cv01093
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Sharon Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01009
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pressley Ridge School for the Deaf v. Graham Local School District, Board of Education
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Pressley Ridge School for the Deaf
Defendant:
Graham Local School District, Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00143
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Graham v. Discount Drug Mart, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Stacey Graham
Defendant:
Discount Drug Mart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Armstrong v. Madison Township Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv00764
Plaintiff:
James M. Armstrong
Defendant:
Madison Township Police Dept., Ron Graham, Kitchen Chef/Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio et al v. Pitts et al
as 1:2017cv00385
Petitioner:
Devin Branch , Kelvin Erby and Tracy Udrija-Peters
Respondent:
Christopher Pitts , Earnest Smith , Khadijah Guy and others
3rd_pty_defendant:
Nathaniel Martin and Barbara J. Thomas
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Christopher Pitts , Belinda Kyle , Brandon King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
