Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 269
Humane Society of The United States et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2017cv00117
Plaintiff: Humane Society of The United States and The Fund for Animals
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Ryan Zinke and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES et al v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2017cv01719
Plaintiff: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES , ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , ASSOCIATION OF IRRITATED RESIDENTS and others
Defendant: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and E. SCOTT PRUITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Hiroshi Horiike, et al v. The Humane Society of the US, et al
as 17-56275
Plaintiff - Appellant: HIROSHI (GENLIN) HORIIKE and WORLD DOG ALLIANCE LTD., a Hong Kong limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and WAYNE PACELLE
State of Alaska, et al v. Ryan Zinke, et al
as 17-35618
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, ALASKA PROFESSIONAL HUNTERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: RYAN K. ZINKE, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, MITCH ELLIS, in his official capacity as Chief of Refuges for the Alaska Region of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: ALASKA WILDLIFE ALLIANCE, ALASKANS FOR WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF ALASKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGES and others
Movant - Appellant: RONALD T. WEST, Proposed Intervenor
Hiroshi Horiike, et al v. Humane Society of the United, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55853
Plaintiff - Appellant: HIROSHI (GENLIN) HORIIKE and WORLD DOG ALLIANCE LTD., a Hong Kong limited liability company
Defendant - Appellee: HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WAYNE PACELLE and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Puppies 'N Love, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 15-16669
Plaintiff / Appellant: PUPPIES 'N LOVE, FRANK MINEO and VICKI MINEO
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF PHOENIX
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES
Front Range Equine Rescue et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2013cv00639
Plaintiff: Barbara Sink, Front Range Equine Rescue, Deborah Trahan and others
Intervenor Defendant: Rains Natural Meats, New Mexico Cattlegrowers' Association, Scenic View Ranch and others
Defendant: Elizabeth A. Hagen, Tom Vilsack and Alfred A. Almanza
Amicus Curiae: Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon
Intervenor: Valley Meat Company, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff: State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
California Sea Urchin Comm., et al v. Rachel Jacobson, et al
as 17-55428
Plaintiff - Appellant: CALIFORNIA SEA URCHIN COMMISSION, CALIFORNIA ABALONE ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LOBSTER AND TRAP FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellee: RACHEL JACOBSON, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife & Parks, Department of Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: FRIENDS OF THE SEA OTTER, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant: Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. , Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shinaberry v. Town of Murfreesboro, N.C. et al DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE 2:17-CV-7-F.
as 4:2017cv00033
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Shinaberry
Defendant: Town of Murfreesboro, N.C., Bobbie J Barmer, Michael P Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?