Cases 91 - 100 of 188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Ampedbar, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02123
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ampedbar, LLC and Steven Bodden
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. 105 Restaurant and Lounge LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02125
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
105 Restaurant and Lounge LLC, Manuel Medeiros and Venus Garcia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Clubhouse Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02128
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Clubhouse Cafe, LLC and Anthony Dandonoli
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Brazilian Sports Club LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02013
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Brazilian Sports Club LLC and Demetrio Ayala, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Washington v. Kahn et al
as 3:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jayvell-Jones Washington
Defendant:
Maria Araujo Kahn, Robert Quintanilla, Jr., Ivan Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Richard et al
as 3:2017cv01444
Plaintiff:
Richard Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Karen Richard, Joe Richard and Kimberly Chernecky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seniw v. Connecticut General Assembly et al
as 3:2017cv01347
Plaintiff:
Bohdan G. Seniw
Defendant:
Connecticut General Assembly, Marilyn Moore, Christopher Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Ganim et al v. Brandi et al
as 3:2017cv01303
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ganim and Joe Ganim 2018
Defendant:
Michael J. Brandi and George Jepsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltas et al v. Chapdelaine et al
as 3:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas , Jason Goode , Derek Stockwell and others
Defendant:
Carol Chapdelaine and Giulianna Mudano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
